Food manufacturers are investing heavily in new technology, yet many plants struggle to train workers fast enough to keep pace, raising concerns about both productivity and food safety compliance.
Technology spending outpaces workforce skills
A recent survey by Fluke Corporation found that 72% of manufacturing organizations intend to allocate between 16% and 30% of their maintenance budgets to new technology within the next year.
The same study reported that 78% of the obstacles cited by manufacturing leaders stem from skills‑related challenges rather than equipment cost or availability.
These figures suggest a growing mismatch between the speed of technology adoption and the ability of employees to master the tools. In food and beverage facilities, the stakes are higher because improper use of equipment can trigger food safety violations in addition to lost output.
Training gaps specific to food production
According to Vineet Thuvara, chief product officer at the company, the food sector requires an extra layer of instruction to meet FDA regulations.
Workers must follow Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures that dictate how surfaces are cleaned and how equipment is designed for easy, non‑toxic maintenance. Such protocols are rarely covered in depth by traditional classroom programs, meaning new hires rely heavily on on‑the‑job guidance.
Related: McCormick must fix ERP to meet $300M target
Recent employment data shows a decline in food and beverage jobs, prompting debate over whether automation is displacing workers or if the industry simply cannot find candidates with the right skill set. Thuvara argues the core issue is a skills gap: younger workers often lack the technical knowledge needed for modern factories and bring expectations that current tools cannot meet.
Partnerships with trade schools and universities are frequently cited as a solution. Fluke’s collaboration with Washington State University equips classrooms with professional test and measurement instruments that mirror those used on the factory floor.
Students benefit from mentorship by industry professionals, which can accelerate their readiness when they graduate.
While educational ties help, the reality on the plant floor evolves quickly. Techniques taught in schools may become outdated before graduates enter the workforce, making apprenticeship programs that expose learners to digital workflows and contemporary equipment increasingly valuable.
When a CEO spots a readiness shortfall, the immediate recommendation is to launch initiatives that combine hands‑on practice with exposure to the actual tools employees will use.
Providing thorough overviews of new processes can build confidence, leading to better adoption and higher productivity over time.
Related: Winning Prop 65 Food Cases Requires Averaging
In the broader picture, these trends highlight a classic supply‑and‑demand problem: as factories modernize, the talent pipeline must adjust in parallel.
The challenge is not merely about buying the latest sensors or automation kits; it’s about ensuring that the workforce can operate them safely and efficiently.
Addressing the gap will likely require coordinated effort between manufacturers, educators, and policymakers.
Without such collaboration, the risk of costly downtime and regulatory breaches may increase, undermining the very benefits that new technology promises.
Collaboration is essential.